User talk:Athanatophobos

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search

Upload

Hi there -- just letting you know that if you want to add images to an article, you have to upload them. Be sure to follow our policy with regard to adding images (see item 9). Thanks for your contributions, and welcome to Boobpedia! The Honorable 10:11, 7 November 2011 (EST)


Some reactions about models

Sherlyn Chopra : "Indian women reaction : India women want Playboy banned over Bollywood star Sherlyn Chopra’s nude shoot. A number of grassroots women’s activists in Delhi are calling for the India government to bar the selling of the upcoming issue that will have the first Indian woman on the cover. The groups, who have yet to go public with their demands, met in the upscale Jor Bagh neighborhood on Wednesday, with some 25 women attending. They are to voice their frustration at Sherlyn Chopra going full nude, leaving nothing to the imagination, in a recent shoot for American adult magazine Playboy. They told Bikyamasr.com that they will establish a Facebook group and urge the authorities to ensure Indians cannot view the naked images of Chopra. Chopra herself admitted she has not told her Muslim mother about the photoshoot, but told the BBC: “My sister is proud of my achievement. I haven’t told anything to my mother but I think I will visit her and tell her that she has to accept me the way I am.” “People feel that I have brought shame to the country but some have encouraged me as well,” she said. Chopra said she had approached Playboy and claimed on Twitter that her late father, who was a doctor and a Christian, would have been “so proud.” But in India, where women are often sexualized and objectified, women say, the photo shoot will do more harm than good for the country. Local booksellers told Bikyamasr.com that the Chopra issues is likely to see massive sales. “We are looking to have twice as many, but that is if we can get them,” he said. With Indian women’s rights activists lamenting the sexualization of women in the country, they fear the backlash from Chopra’s nude shoot with the American adult magazine. Although they grant Chopra the right to do what she wants with her body, show it off to whomever, including the world, they argue it could be a negative for the country, hit by a massive number of sexual violence toward women in recent months. Chopra released the photos in a series of tweets on her personal Twitter account on Thursday. The nude shoot has sparked anger among women’s rights advocates in the country, saying that India has already “sexualized” women and the nude shoot will only “heighten the stereotypes.” Sunita Gudnanti, a social worker who works with battered women in Delhi, told Bikyamasr.com that she is disappointed in Chopra’s decision to do the photo shoot. “I have heard so many stories of women being beaten up by their spouses or boyfriends because they refused to do something the man read or saw online, so the idea that an Indian woman will go nude for the magazine is likely to sexualize the issue of women’s rights and heighten the stereotypes that women are objects,” she said. Chopra, who is currently in Los Angeles, announced she would be shooting for the adult magazine this week, and “has already gone through hair and make-up trial sessions.” The Indian woman has reportedly also taken up shop in Playboy owner Hugh Hefner’s mansion. When published, Chopra will be the first Indian to grace the cover of the magazine. She said the shoot will be “explicit,” which Gudnanti argues will be a negative for Indian society. “We deal with sexual violence towards women on a daily basis here and one of the reasons for this explosion, we believe, is that the media has sexualized and made women objects,” she argued. “Look at Times of India’s website and others, it is full of articles about women and sex, their bodies and images of naked or little clothed women. It is very sad,” she added. Speaking to Times of India from the US, Chopra said she felt “proud to be the first Indian to do it,” and added, “The youth is racing towards liberalization, and that’s why being unconventional in your choices is no longer a taboo."

Dani Mathers : "2016 Body Shaming Scandal : On July 15th 2016, Dani Mathers posting on Snapchat a picture of an unsuspecting nude woman, a fellow gym goer, at the LA Fitness gym along with a photo of her face with her hand over her mouth with the caption: 'If I can't unsee this then you can't either!'[1]. Meant to be sent to a friend - this photo is making it's way around the internet. Dani quickly deleted the image and apologised for her actions after sparking a huge backlash.

The 2015 Playboy Playmate of the year was suspended from her regular radio show gig on the "Heidi and Frank" show on KLOS 95.5 and banned from all L.A. Fitness facilities. L.A. fitness confirmed to the gossip site that Mathers "is not permitted back at any club, ever."[2]

References

"

Question

How do I get the subcategory I created to appear as a subcategory on the Slim category page Thank you, spk210

Modification

Hello, I'm not sure if this is the proper way to respond, I hope so. I created the sub category Category:Slim with large natural breasts and I have added that category to the women you find in that category why do you ask? best regards, spk210

Welcome to Boobpedia

Hi Athanatophobos. I just noticed that you've been doing lots of good work lately so I thought I'd say hello and encourage you to keep up the good work. BTW, what's Athanatophobos a fear of? --Loose cannon 06:58, 12 November 2011 (EST)

Amanda Hanshaw

You're right, they do appear to be the same person. I've created a redirect from Mandy Marie Michaels to Amanda Hanshaw. In the future, if you find duplicates like this, you (or any editor) can also combine the articles and add redirects where appropriate. The Honorable 07:58, 18 November 2011 (EST)

Kyra Milan

You're right, the minimum cup size is C. I've deleted the Kyra Milan article. Thanks for letting me know. The Honorable 07:54, 25 November 2011 (EST)

ok, I was wondering why Kyra didn't have a page here. She is actually listed as a C cup in her Fresh Faces issue. I'm not sure why Playboy changed her to a B cup when her breasts actually grew larger between the SE and PMOM shoots.

Arianny Celeste

For copyright reasons, we generally limit the number of photos in articles if we don't have permission to use them. See Boobpedia:FAQ#How many images are permitted in an article?]]. The Honorable 11:48, 26 November 2011 (EST)

Answer

Athanatophobos November 26, 2011

ok, I will put only one nude photo of the models.

Vicki Peters, etc.

The Vicki Peters article looks fine. The other article has been protected because the article's subject requested that her article be removed. The Honorable 20:09, 2 December 2011 (EST)

Playboy Cyber Girl list

A list of all the Cyber Girls would be fine, though it would probably be very lengthy... :) The Honorable 16:58, 23 December 2011 (EST)

Deborah Driggs

There appears to be a copyright problem with the photos that were used. Hexvoodoo has been handling this, so he would be the person to ask about this. The Honorable 11:01, 22 January 2012 (EST)

we received a copyright complaint on the photo posted, and needed to remove it. it was not helpful to immediately post another photo with unclear copyright. therefore i had to lock the page. we need a photo for which we have permission to use. thanks for your understanding. --Hexvoodoo 16:51, 26 January 2012 (EST)

"only one nude picture"

Hi Atanatophobos. I notice you removing many images with the edit summary, "only one nude picture". Could you point me to the policy which dictates only one nude photo? Thank you. Dekkappai 16:10, 23 January 2012 (EST)

Boobpedia:Policy and Boobpedia:FAQ#How many images are permitted in an article?. Teddy 16:17, 23 January 2012 (EST)
That's more about fair use images, though. If it's a really short article, it shouldn't have five fair use images, but if it's a longer article, it might be okay. It doesn't matter if the photos are nudes or not. :) The Honorable 16:22, 23 January 2012 (EST)
Well, that's my question-- I see articles with multiple images, but one, nude, image being removed... Dekkappai 16:23, 23 January 2012 (EST)

Hi again, Atanatophobos. (No need to apologize for the English. I have an international family-- Korean, English & Japanese.) If I understand the image policy correctly though, one image-- nude or covered-- is recommended for stub articles. (Usually in the infobox for a biography.) More images are allowed for longer articles. (My personal preference is to scatter them throughout a longer article-- as in Chesty Morgan-- rather than bunch them together in a "Gallery". Though I know that "Galleries" are common here...) Also, I haven't seen it mentioned explicitly, but my assumption is that a template has an image, which is not counted when in use in an article. If it were, no images would be allowed in filmographies-- which I think would be a draconian application of the policy. Regards. Dekkappai 16:56, 23 January 2012 (EST)

I also reverted some of your edits to reinstate images on articles that I've worked on as I figured they were covered by fair use. --Loose cannon 11:48, 24 January 2012 (EST)

Bra template / band size

I thought I should let you know that the bra template (used in the biobox) should include the band size (commonly specified in inches). See Template:Bra for more info. Best wishes, Loose cannon 11:48, 24 January 2012 (EST)

That's cool. I think you do very good work on this site and make better quality contributions than many native English speakers. It's a tendency in human nature to only bring up edits that are problematic but not to say anything when the editor is doing good work.

I don't know if you made many more edits to models' bra sizes - I only noticed the edits that appear in my Watchlist - but it would be appreciated it if you could re-edit the others (if any) to include the band size. Best wishes Loose cannon 20:24, 24 January 2012 (EST)

Salut! You can see all your edits at Special:Contributions/Athanatophobos but if you can't easily remember which pages you removed the band size from, I wouldn't worry too much about it. As I said, I only just noticed the articles that appeared on on my watchlist.
BTW, when you're signing messages you can simply add ~~~~ to the end of your message and the Boobpedia software automaticaly adds the date and time along with your username. Bien à toi, Loose cannon 11:23, 25 January 2012 (EST)

Restoring Removed Images

Hi Athanatophobos,

I restored the Sara Jay image because it was actually licensed for use on Boobpedia. i.e. a previous contributor had secured permission from the copyright owner to use the image on Boobpedia. I didn't think it was a suitable image for the biobox so I kept it in the body article. For Rebecca Linares, the image showed how she looked before her enhancement surgery so from an encylopaedic perspective the image greatly enhanced her article.

I also recently restored an image that you removed of Adriana Russo. I had uploaded that a couple of years ago as another contributor was refusing to believe that her boobs are enhanced so I had uploaded an image shoe which showed her pre-surgery and another displaying the surgical scars indicating that her boobs are enhanced. For models who have had breast enhancements, such images augment the article as they provide relevant information on the subject rather than simply look good.

I appreciate the good work that you do and certainly some articles contain too many images but I think you can be a little too enthusiastic in your interpretation of the Fair Use Images guideline. BTW, I always provide the reason for my edits in the Summary field so they can be seen by checking the article history page.

Best wishes, Loose cannon 15:46, 29 February 2012 (EST)

Jesse Jane

I mainly reverted the change because you included her real name, which is generally not allowed here (see Boobpedia:Policy). But you can re-add the birth year change, since you have sources for it. The Honorable 12:51, 2 March 2012 (EST)

Irene Hoek

The reference that I was using if I remember correctly was pornpedia. not 100% to be honest. Will be more careful with the references next time.

Smithy 16:46, 22 April 2012 (EDT)

Deleting unlinked images?

Hi, Thanks for all your excellent work on the site, Athanatophobos. I have a novice question about an image file that you unlinked from the Penny Minor page. I now understand that one should only use a single "fair use" image on short articles. My question is: is there a way to delete such unused image files from the server/site, or do we juse leave them as "orphans"? Effcup 00:17, 29 April 2012 (EDT)

Breast types

My site can be used as a reference for identifing the new Playboy Plus models with natural or enhanced breasts. I have an eye for this thing and know how to tell the difference in photos and will watch videos for further evidence. So you can check the Tags on a model page and see if I have tagged her as 'naturalbreasts' or 'breastimplants'.

For example, on the new Alyssa Marie page, http://playboyplus.wikispaces.com/Alyssa+Marie+PBP, in the upper-right corner you can click the three dots ... to see the tags on her page. I have tagged her as 'breastimplants'. This info can be used for boobpedia.

I would also appreciate if you include an external link on new model pages to my site. Thanks. cbz 5/10/2012 2:49 am


Playboy South Africa

Hi, a friend of mine wanted to see the South African Playmates on boobpedia - http://www.playboy.co.za/?cat=4

Would you want to help me out with this? I'll be able to provide info early next week. If you have time and would want to help list these Playmates, it would be appreciated. Thanks Cbz April 13, 07:28 AM EST

2013 Playmates

I've created a blank {{2013 playmates}} template. The Honorable 07:31, 1 August 2012 (EDT)

deleted picture

thanks for letting me know. i'm not going to complain, but you know there are lots of other small pages with two or even three pictures, such as Betty Jean Bradley, Emmie Ihle, Lori Wagner, and Tina Kay. i see no real reason that Ariel Piperfawn can't have two pictures as well, especially since ariel has a much larger body of work than someone like emmie ihle.

Deleted article

Yes, she requested it be deleted. The Honorable 16:10, 15 January 2013 (EST)

Playboy Cyber Girls page

Looks good! The Honorable 17:26, 1 February 2013 (EST)


Shawn Dillon

Hello,

Boobslover74 March 7th 2013

Sorry, i've not noticed that she has a B-Cup, thanks for correct my mistake!

Cyber Girls template

It may take me a while to do the Cyber Girls template, but I'll try to get to it when I can. The Honorable 07:45, 23 March 2013 (EDT)

Instagram in biobox

You can now add Instagram usernames in the biobox; just add

| instagram = username

like with the other websites. The Honorable 17:07, 22 April 2013 (EDT)

Freeones links

Sorry about that -- I put "free" in the spam blacklist, but forgot about "freeones.com". :) It's fixed now. The Honorable 15:21, 27 May 2013 (EDT)

"Happy birthday"

Thanks! The Honorable 08:30, 6 July 2013 (EDT)


Pics Deletion

Boobslover74 August 11th 2013

Dear Mr.Athanatophobos What's the reason do you did delete my pictures? I've not created a second nude pic, it's rather a Performance Pic !! see here: http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Category:Pregnant_images (or a Fetish Pic) many of our Boobpedians loves this Pics i think, not many Girls are able to do that Performance, or have the Courage to show herselves when they are pregnant. So i think a second pic is allowed, also in small articles, to take an honour to this Girls who show their attributes!

What do You mean?

Marking pages for deletion

When you mark pages for deletion, just add {{Delete}} to the top of the page instead of erasing the article; that way it's easier for me to review the article and make sure it should be deleted. The Honorable 13:05, 29 January 2014 (EST)

Answer

Athanatophobos January 29th, 2014

Sorry, I don't think about that. I will do that the next time.

VEFDT

I've decided to disable the VEFDT template, as most of the posts there appear to be collections of images, and we discourage links to galleries, especially when they may be copyright violations. The Honorable 14:17, 1 February 2014 (EST)

Answer

ok, so, some links have to be cancelled.

Samantha Alexandra

There were two references, I can't remember the other one.

http://www.barelist.com/models/id_13193_Samantha_Alexandra.html

It's widely documented she is a Libra as well, which fits the bill.

--DMessr82 17:06, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Scarlet Lovatt?

What happened to her page? There's no history of it whatsoever now.--DMessr82 19:33, 18 February 2014 (EST)

"Her page seems to be deleted. Maybe her bra size is smaller than C cup." Athanatophobos February 19th, 2014
I can say with absolute certainty that this is not the case. Even before she had her implants done, she was more than a C cup. It's pretty frustrating to go to this effort to contribute to a page only for it to be deleted with no apparent reason.--DMessr82 14:12, 19 February 2014 (EST)

Scarlett Johansson

I removed the stolen/leaked photos because we don't post those -- we don't want to get sued. I took down the Under the Skin by mistake; one from that is fine. The Honorable 07:17, 29 May 2014 (EDT)

Geena Mullins

The reason I deleted the Playboywiki link, was that there hasn't been a page created with that name! Seems silly having a link which provides nothing, like having an article full of dead links.

Model deletion

She did prove she was who she said she was. I think she may have objected to the name that was used, which is different from the name she used for Playboy. The Honorable 18:29, 27 June 2014 (EDT)

Katie Banks

Hi !
I deleted it because Freeones is not a good ref for a lot of elements of the bio : it's better to find them at an official source, and moreover, Freeones often gives false informations (indicating some breast are fake or natural even if they are not).
But you can let it if you want ;) ! I usually delete them, it's not particulary you..!
Gh0st 14:42, 16 July 2014 (EDT)


Emma Glover

Hello to you too! I was watching a video of hers yesterday and in my disappointment i saw tiny stitch marks under her right boob. The girl is gorgeous with a perfect body and i continue to like her but now something is lost from her perfect naturality. Here is the video: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1lofav_emma-glover-topless-on-bed_redband Go to 3:32 until 3:40. I changed back to enhanced referances. Nptime 04:36, 29 July 2014 (EDT)

Man if you don't want to see the stitch marks it's fine by me. But "BoobPedia" should be as real as it gets so it must have real information for the boobs involved. I will change back the referance and i will inform the aministrators to judge the difference. Nptime 04:36, 29 July 2014 (EDT)

I really don't have anything with the girl or with you. I admire her and i continue to admire her perfect body even now. But i believe that freeones is wrong, or it was right until one moment this year. But now she has done something, even a little. The boobs are just perfect in shape and size. Take a closer look at the video. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1lofav_emma-glover-topless-on-bed_redband The marks can be seen from 3:32 until 3:40 or from 5:25 to 5:37. Maybe they are more clear at the second segment. I am just trying to be honest too! I only want boobpedia to be the referance for every other page with it's true informations. Nptime 20:33, 29 July 2014 (EDT)

Image licenses

Hi. I'm just writing to remind you that you need to select the correct license whenever you upload an image. Select the 'fair use' option if you do not hold the copyright to the image. Thanks. Teddy 19:09, 14 December 2014 (EST)

Deleted pages

If someone has requested not to be included, we protect the title so that an article can't be created. So Special:ProtectedTitles might have what you're looking for. The Honorable 16:59, 10 April 2015 (EDT)

References

The references are from Playboywiki (> tags). I've only forgot to add them. NOYDB

Ashleigh Hannah

It won't do any harm to wait until the Freeones page is up before adding a link. The Honorable 16:33, 5 August 2015 (EDT)

Paige Phillips

The only references are freeones and playboywiki neither are reliable. freeones doesn't even say natural or fake. Watch some of her videos, trust me, there's no movement to them and they don't sit naturally. It's one thing to have young firm breasts but even those move a little.

Abigail Ratchford

Are images[1][2][3] a reliable source as far as natural vs. enhanced goes? —Squalla1 13:22, 30 October 2015 (EDT)

Ah, but that was not a rhetorical question. I'm legitimately asking whether images are a reliable source. Based on your reply, however, I would assume they are. —Squalla1 12:49, 31 October 2015 (EDT)

Playboy Cyber Girl template

Do you mean like the Playmate templates? The Honorable 11:37, 3 February 2016 (EST)

OK, I've created the blank templates for Template:2001 playboy cyber girls‎ through Template:2014 playboy cyber girls‎. The Honorable 13:45, 3 February 2016 (EST)

Duplicate articles: please merge content before overwriting with redirect

Hi. Merging duplicate articles should be done more carefully, it's not just a matter of only overwriting the duplicate with a redirect. "The same model twice" does *not* mean the same content twice. Content on both articles may be different and need to be properly merged. Otherwise, dropping good content from the "old" article that is not in the "new" one is actually a deletion and a waste of previous contributor efforts, and is violating number one condition for wiki editing to work: avoiding regressions.

In the last merge deletion you did for instance here for Josie Stevens, the whole Wikipedia text, Wikipedia reference and categories were dropped without adding them to the merged-to article. That's sloppy work. If you don't feel like doing the work of properly merging content, then don't do it and just leave a note on the Boobpedia:Duplicates page. Thanks. --Bernie55 (talk) 09:52, 10 April 2016 (EDT)

I'm complaining because it's the responsibility of the editor who deletes information to add it to the other article. It must be like that, because of the no-regressions principle of wikis, and because once the redirect is done there's no quick way for anyone to know an article should be appended some previously-deleted information. The few contributors here have other things to do than check and correct all edits of other long-time editors.
Anyway, I intend to check and correct all your previous redirects, but please please merge correctly in the future.
No problem with your English, it's fine. And I'm a French native speaker too... Salut! --Bernie55 (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2016 (EDT)

External links section title is must be in plural always

Please don't edit correct named section titles and don't create a wrong ones with singular spelling of links. External links in plural is a STANDARD section title in Boobpedia either section contains just one link or more. —nonduc (talk) 15:36, 10 May 2016 (EDT)

The standard title naming in Boobpedia uses PLURAL for Awards and nominations, Big tit movies / pictures of pagename, External links, etc. in a case the one award, movie, or link is listed too -- to avoid mistakes when the second will be added but the editor will not edit a section title and to avoid unnecessary editing of a section title. Try to find External links section title as External link in singular in Wikipedia -- you couldn't after the same reason. —nonduc (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2016 (EDT)

Dani Mathers' body shaming scandal

Please remember that an editor making changes you disagree with is not automatically "vandalism." Also, the Dani Mathers "body shaming scandal" is not important enough to take up half of her article. The Honorable (talk) 10:50, 13 August 2016 (EDT)

jessica ashley

bonjour , il te faut chercher le photoshoot qu'elle a fait pour play boy allemagn, ici par exemple , j'avais remarquer la difference sur ces snap censuréss mais j'ai eu du mal a trouver les photos,l'operation est assez reussie mais je je preferais nettement avant.....

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

Delz Angel

She provided those images, so it's OK to keep them. We try to avoid using a lot of images if we don't have the rights to them. As long as they show boobs, though, they're OK. :) The Honorable (talk) 12:58, 5 September 2016 (EDT)


PB Plus template

Sorry about not answering your previous request. Anyway, we do have a {{Playboyplus}} template you can use, though I don't know how to get it to link to a specific page and include our affiliate referrer code. The Honorable (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2016 (EST)

Do not delete pages!

That is not the answer. If the pages are deleted then the troll SB Fan 1983 will win! He doesn't care about what you and I and The Honorable say, he's just here to cause trouble! He should be deleted, not Melissa's article! JoeBethersonton (talk) 15:19, 11 December 2016 (EST)

  • Regarding your edit summary "(let it blank. I am about to ask page deletion because of war between members...)"—we are not going to delete pages because editors are disagreeing about aspects of them. The Honorable (talk) 17:39, 28 December 2016 (EST)

List of Penthouse Pets

Most of the deleted links on the Penthouse Pets were post-1990s, and even the ones deleted in the era prior to that are retired and have not returned to modeling, so it is safe to say they aren't going to get breast augmentation down the road or ever had an augmentation. Most of the verification of cup size come with sources which I didn't not provide. Most come from Penthouse, the model's bio, and source material like Babeslist, thenude.eu, or FreeOnes. While I understand the reasoning to keep the brackets, wouldn't it be easier to go back and add them on the list later. I discovered 2 instances where the model already had a page but was not linked up to the list, so it's not like this doesn't happen anyway. Bluesman2383(talk) 7:00, 16th January 2017 (CET)

Your comment

Regarding your comment about that Playmate: It was an actual request by someone working on her behalf. The Honorable (talk) 07:51, 18 February 2017 (EST)

Christy Teigen

The picture I took down looked like a faked nude. The Honorable (talk) 15:28, 18 March 2017 (EDT)

Main Page

That was a mistake. I've fixed the main page so that it has the link to create an article again. The Honorable (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2017 (EDT)

Stanija Dobrojevic

See http://www.svet.rs/vesti/estrada/neprepoznatljiva-ovako-je-stanija-izgledala-pre-operacije-grudi-foto The Honorable (talk) 19:19, 3 August 2017 (EDT)

Molly Stewart

Porn videos at ManyVids: masturbation, dildo, lesbian, lesbian dildo, anal play, anal gaping performances. --nonduc (talk) 09:49, 29 August 2017 (EDT)

Babepedia

Regarding Babepedia, we don't want to link to sites that only contain galleries of images stolen from other sites. The Honorable (talk) 06:44, 29 September 2017 (EDT)

Emma Glover

I restored Emma Glover discussion page after this one contains contribution of many users, not only yours. If you want to restore your last addition, please do it by yourself. —nonduc (talk) 12:32, 1 October 2017 (EDT)

You forgot nobody answered in my last question and I don't know why.

Years

I've added the years to Category:Years. The Honorable (talk) 16:45, 4 November 2017 (EDT)

File:Capture.JPG

I don't understand why you uploaded that over an existing image, instead of uploading it as a new image. That file was also being used on List of Brazilian porn stars. Also that image you posted appears to be referring to a man with that name, and says nothing about anyone dying. The Honorable (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2018 (EDT)

I'm very sure. That clipping is about a man with that name and (presumably) his wife filing a lawsuit. It has nothing to do with anyone's death. The Honorable (talk) 14:48, 5 May 2018 (EDT)

List of Hustler Honeys of the Month

At the moment first year with data is 2011. The TOC (table of content) with previous years in it is misleading. You can add a year data to the list an then add link to the year to TOC. —nonduc (talk) 04:35, 17 June 2018 (EDT)

Nichole Van Croft

Please stop adding that Nichole Van Croft has died unless you have a source that says so. The link you used as a reference does not mention "Nichole Van Croft." The Honorable (talk) 15:51, 13 July 2018 (EDT)

That page only proves that someone with that name died. It does not say that it is the same person as Nichole Van Croft. Please provide a better source. The Honorable (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2018 (EDT)

YesBoobs Galleries

Don't remove my galleries!

Pictures and short articles

Hi there. We're only concerned about the number of photos on an article if it's a short article and we don't have explicit permission from the owner of the photos. If we have permission to use the photos, or if they have been added by the owner of the photos, then that's OK. We have permission from Yes Boobs to use their photos, and they have added photos themselves, so they don't have to be removed. Thanks! The Honorable (talk) 19:21, 27 August 2018 (EDT)

FreeOnes and natural/enhanced boobs

Hi, while it's good to provide references and sources for information, FreeOnes isn't a great source, and we should use better sources. Thanks. The Honorable (talk) 18:33, 27 September 2018 (EDT)

Yaya Han

The image is not of Yaya Han, it is Li Ling Ling. The websites that identify her as Yaya Han are wrong. The Honorable (talk) 18:56, 7 November 2018 (EST)

playmates for november and december 2019

the information came from the following websites

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Playboy_Playmates_of_2019

https://www.playboy.com/profile/jordy-murray

https://www.playboy.com/profile/gillian-chan

Huey4321(talk)


Antonia Deona and Stacey Saran

Wazi October 13th 2019

I switched these two pages because the Antonia Deona page has a history page starting 2009 whereas Stacey Saran page's history starts at 2015...

2020s decade

It's not protected, so you can add it if you like. The Honorable (talk) 18:04, 20 October 2019 (EDT)

Sorry, I must have misunderstood what you were asking for. What would you like added or changed? The Honorable (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2019 (EST)

Lina

I am struggling to see how the Lina in the article on Boobpedia and the one in the link are the same person. [14] BSP (talk) 13:22, 18 April 2020 (EDT)

Booblover89

Booblover89 has been blocked from editing. The Honorable (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2020 (EDT)

Alexis Ren

Hi! Sorry I forgot to add some references to my change from natural breast to enhanced. Here they are : https://preview.redd.it/vcwdrxzrwp321.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=4fcd3e38013089e403b8d617bc2681de4b9e7d61 They are several talks about her boob job, but a lot pics clearly show she did it !


Tammy Dukes

Why did you change her from Enhanced to Natural? The babepedia ref clearly has her listed as Enhanced. BlueMax (talk) 22:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

About Maria Body

Good Morning! I really admire your work, you are a veteran user! And there is no doubt that you always try to do your best, but I respect Maria Body's page:

I have contact with her, and she is aware of this site. For this reason, she has asked me to modify and correct some elements, among others, change the photo and remove links.

You will understand that I am doing my best, and respecting Maria's decision. Hope this doesn't bother you! And you understand why I am modifying Maria's page. I know the page is very poor, I will fill in little by little


> bettercallsasha

Chelsea James

Hi, I did not change the date of birth, if you check the edit history, it was Yes Boobs. BSP (talk) 19:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Tammy Dukes

I can say from personal knowledge (as I described) that Tammy's breasts are indeed enhanced and that she would be pleased that you think they look natural. Dr. Ronald Perlman MD, the doctor that performed all of her breast augmentation's would also be pleased. BlueMax (talk) 23:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Chelsea James

We have permission to use the YesBoobs photo on Chelsea James, you don't need to delete it. The Honorable (talk) 22:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Jordan Pryce

Jordanprycexxx is Jordan Pryce. She can change or delete whatever she wants in an article about her. The Honorable (talk) 23:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Chea Tennille

I found the problem: The "death month," "death day," and "death year" fields were included twice, and the second set was blank, so those were displayed. The Honorable (talk) 13:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Patty Michova Breasts

Athanatophobos: Even the reference that you provided indicates that her breasts are enhanced. I even posted a pre-augmentation photo. What more do you want? I am changing it back to enhanced (Silicone). BlueMax (talk) 16:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your question

We deleted the photo because we received a deletion request from her lawyers. The Honorable (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Playboywiki

Playboy Wiki has been closed for some time, so links redirect to Playboy Plus. The Honorable (talk) 00:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Tammy Edits

Not 2 edit today. Look at the history. I last night and another today. BlueMax (talk) 18:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

There is no rule about how many times a day a page can be edited. Please don't pester other users about this. Thanks. The Honorable (talk) 22:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Yes, but I have to check out all the pages as to see there aren't wild changes (babepedia links, natural goes to enhanced without a reference, etc.).

So, when I saw three or more edits per day, I become crazy because I have to check again and again.

Athanatophobos 7:11, 23 July 2021 (CEST)

When I view my watchlist or recent changes and I see multiple changes for a profile, I can see the changes "grouped" together. So I don't understand why you would have to go back multiple times to review the changes. (i'm not trying to be a pain, I'm trying to understand your issue fully). BlueMax (talk) 14:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

It is not the case because I check pages every 10 minutes. So I check a page, and, some minutes later, I have to check it one more time because there is an edit, and so on. It is tiring.

For Tammy, I look the history and you did two changes the 22 of July, two more the 20 of July.

https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME29VVO

Athanatophobos 20:38 (CEST), 23 July 2021

You are not taking the timezone into consideration! You were complaining about the July 22, now you change it to 20th. Just leave me alone! As The Honorable said there is no limit. Do we want things correct on a profile or not? BlueMax (talk) 21:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Athanatophobos: Do not tell people how often they can edit. While your diligence is appreciated, no one is making you check the site every 10 minutes. Also, don't demand other users change their behavior here to suit you.

If you go to the "Recent changes" tab in Special:Preferences, you can customize the recent changes page to group together multiple edits of the same page. To the right of the edit time are the words (cur | prev). If you select cur, it compares that edit to the current version of the page. If you select prev, it compares that edit to the prevous edit. If several edits are made in a row, it's only necessary to check the most recent one, not every one in between. The Honorable (talk) 23:12, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Don't harass people for making typos, like you did here. The Honorable (talk) 23:37, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

I didn't harass people! In fact, I see pages with mistakes "dukes" instead of "Dukes". I just gave an advice. As I told you, I check all pages and I spent time for this. But, I don't harass people.

Crystal Stevens

I forgot to add USA, sorry. As for the Playboywiki, I didn't try the link. I don't always try every link on a page, I just don'talways have the time. BlueMax (talk) 23:00, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

CameronPerkins

Just giving yo a heads up regarding the user CameronPerkins. He has been making changes to several pages that are clearly false and easily verified as wrong. Even going back after corrections have been made and making the same changes. I have reported him to The Honorable for investigation and more details are on The Honorables talk page, if you are interested. i just thought you should know. Regards, BlueMax (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Group sex category Question

Does a three-way count as "Group sex" for purposes of categorization? Thanks. BlueMax (talk) 21:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Kyla Deaver

Hello budy, how are you? I'm new to the site, and I'm about to create my first article about actress Kyla Deaver. I only need an image for me to complete the article, but I can't find where it loads at all could you upload this image for me?

Thx

Playboy All Stars

Is this it? Template:2022 allstars The Honorable (talk) 17:55, 10 July 2022 (UTC)


Tammy Dukes Again

Why did you change her from Enhanced to Natural again? The babepedia ref clearly has her listed as Enhanced. Just what point are you trying to make with your harassment of this page? The Honorable has warned you about this before and you behaved yourself for quite a while until today. Please Stop it!

BlueMax (talk) 22:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Reply: I can say from personal knowledge (as I described) that Tammy's breasts are indeed enhanced and that she would be pleased that Athanaphobos think they look natural. Dr. Ronald Perlman MD, the doctor that performed all of her breast augmentation's would also be pleased. BlueMax (talk) 18:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

BlueMax's reply: You must have forgotten that I proved this fact to The Honorable in 2020. Go look at Tammy Dukes' discussion page to refresh your memory. See the reply from "The Honorable" just above the "Brest enhanced or natural". BlueMax (talk) 00:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Help requested

Hi, I am looking for a playmate. I believe she was a playmate for a european version of Playboy. She is very thin with large natural boobs. She has three photo sets that I have seen each with a different color wig. If you have any ideas please let me know.

Thanks Spk210 (talk) 10:46, 3 October 2022 (EST)

Hollywood

Hi, I can see that you reversed the changes the I made to Hollywood, the Babepedia link and death date is for a completely different person, Alicia Monet is on here, and the picture is very similar to that on the Babepedia. I cannot find any connection to that Alicia Monet and this Hollywood, therefore I believe they are separate people. I would suggest leaving the information with my changes intact because there is insufficient evidence to prove otherwise. BSP (talk) 21:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


Paisley Porter

Hi. I was just editing Pailsley Porter and then got an error that said something like "war between members|Deleted". Do you know what happened or what the cause was? Any help is appreciated. Thanks. BlueMax (talk) 21:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

I just saw you are both editing her page over and over. Please, don't editing page several time a day because I have to check all the changes.

Athanatophobos: No you don't. You don't get to tell people how to edit. If you do something like that again you will be blocked from editing. The Honorable (talk) 21:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)